BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) -- The costs of cutting greenhouse gases and who will pay for doing it are likely to be the key issues at a major U.N.-backed climate change meeting of scientists and diplomats in the Thai capital this week, participants said Sunday.
Note the reference to scientists above although the topic of determining "who will pay" is purely political. The CNN article quoted above contains all the usual fear-mongering about the dire consequences of not taking action to stop global warming. We've heard it all before.
But then there's this one little paragraph which gives away the IPCC's real agenda:
Developing countries are likely to demand that richer countries help them adapt to warming global temperatures, which are expected to cause widespread flooding, droughts and rising sea levels.They're not asking, they're demanding! Those scientists from developing countries! How can we here in the evil, greenhouse gas spewing rich countries ever have the nerve to say no? It's not enough that reducing greenhouse gas emissions will have disastrous effects on our own economies; in the noble crusade against climate change we soon will be expected to foot the bill for adaptation by "developing countries".
I wonder exactly how the dictatorial governments of all those 3rd world developing countries really intend to spend the billions of $$$ in aid money they will soon be
Now that the Goracle, Kooky Suzuki, Citizen Dion & company have managed to convince most people that they need to feel deeply, deeply guilty for causing global warming, the IPCC is about to swoop, to cash in on that guilt and begin the process of extorting $ billions more from us.
This is just more proof that Kyoto is essentially a socialist scheme to suck money out of wealth-producing nations. Unfortunately, none of our political leaders any longer has the guts to say so.
Source
1 comment:
There is something going on with the climate. You need to open your eyes to this.
If global warming theory is true and we do nothing, vast devastation will result.
If global warming theory is false and we do something, there will be economic impact but as a side effect, other severe problems may be solved (such as dwindling oil reserves).
Since both of these are likely to be true, the intelligent option is to attempt to do something about human climate impact, while we continue to study the phenomenon.
You will notice that this is a two by two matrix; the other options I didn't mention are "true and do something" and "false and do nothing."
If you treat this matrix as a game theory sum table, you will find very quickly that the only intelligent response is to do something.
Personally, to me, the science is convincing enough that it's worrisome.
Post a Comment